No, the bridge scene was not in the book nor was any of the other attacks that were shown in the beginning of the movie. They were just mentioned in a conversation in the beginning of the book. This change was bad, it would have been more effective and informative if they would have just presented the way the book did. But Hollywood had to go with the action and glitz instead of good dialog.

This happens through out the whole movie. But then, what do you exspect when the makers cater to the brain dead movie goers of today.

The ending was totally changed in the movie, for what purpose. It was more dramatic in the book. I would love to here an explaination from the makers as to the reason for these stupid unnecessary changes.

They wastes screen time on scenes that where of no value to the story. This wasted screen time could have been better used smoothing out the jumping from one scene to another.

Just an eratic movie. The only ones that would like this movie are diehard fans who just will accept anything even if the title was “Harry Potter and The Crappy Movie”

I lost interest in the books (the magic never impressed me and the story is cliche) long ago. I'm glad the movie is growing up, but it may be too late for me to appreciate it.