Comments on: The Philanthropist – TV Review http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/06/23/the-philanthropist-tv-review Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:40:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: tvstandschina.com http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/06/23/the-philanthropist-tv-review/comment-page-1#comment-16582 tvstandschina.com Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:05:00 +0000 http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=4007#comment-16582 There are so many reasons why some chose to be known as philanthropist. And it is not for us to judge their intentions. I think i too should start to be one. There are so many reasons why some chose to be known as philanthropist. And it is not for us to judge their intentions. I think i too should start to be one.

]]> By: Jess http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/06/23/the-philanthropist-tv-review/comment-page-1#comment-16583 Jess Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:42:00 +0000 http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=4007#comment-16583 was in nyc last week and got tickets for jimmy fallon... met the main guy from the philanthropist.... total d bag.... was full of himself.... really ass hole.... hope his show sinks just cuz he was a real douche was in nyc last week and got tickets for jimmy fallon… met the main guy from the philanthropist…. total d bag…. was full of himself…. really ass hole…. hope his show sinks just cuz he was a real douche

]]> By: areyouscreening http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/06/23/the-philanthropist-tv-review/comment-page-1#comment-8810 areyouscreening Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:28:34 +0000 http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=4007#comment-8810 Well, the story being far-fetched and unbelievable is slightly difficult to dance with unless you're more specific, because it's based on a true story. What's the unbelievable part?<br><br>I have no qualms at all with tearing apart anything, no matter what it's about, if that's what it deserves.<br><br>I didn't think it was great, but it has potential. If you think the acting in this was horrible, I'd love to know what you're watching.<br><br>On the other hand, while I don't agree with your reaction, and feel that it is probably based more on theory than actualization, I don't think there is a moral or ethical need for you to rescind your viewpoint... which is a nonsensical statement. Well, the story being far-fetched and unbelievable is slightly difficult to dance with unless you're more specific, because it's based on a true story. What's the unbelievable part?

I have no qualms at all with tearing apart anything, no matter what it's about, if that's what it deserves.

I didn't think it was great, but it has potential. If you think the acting in this was horrible, I'd love to know what you're watching.

On the other hand, while I don't agree with your reaction, and feel that it is probably based more on theory than actualization, I don't think there is a moral or ethical need for you to rescind your viewpoint… which is a nonsensical statement.

]]> By: ChickenSammie http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/06/23/the-philanthropist-tv-review/comment-page-1#comment-8809 ChickenSammie Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:02:51 +0000 http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=4007#comment-8809 Are you kidding me? The show looked great I'll give it that. The Cinematography was top-notch. But boy oh boy was the writing and acting 3rd rate. Lord was the story far-fetched and unbelievable. Everything was just ridiculousy cliche'. The problem for you reviewers is if you pan this terrible show (like it deserves) then you look heartless because the show is about philanthropy. If you don't pan it then you're not being true to good story-telling and acting. But you should rescind your review and tell it like is. This show was nothing but poorly written fluff that used all the cheap methods in the book to tug at the heartstrings of the ignorant. If anyone would like me to go into details I would be happy to fully suppor tmy claim that this show is nothing but poorly thrown together junk. Are you kidding me? The show looked great I'll give it that. The Cinematography was top-notch. But boy oh boy was the writing and acting 3rd rate. Lord was the story far-fetched and unbelievable. Everything was just ridiculousy cliche'. The problem for you reviewers is if you pan this terrible show (like it deserves) then you look heartless because the show is about philanthropy. If you don't pan it then you're not being true to good story-telling and acting. But you should rescind your review and tell it like is. This show was nothing but poorly written fluff that used all the cheap methods in the book to tug at the heartstrings of the ignorant. If anyone would like me to go into details I would be happy to fully suppor tmy claim that this show is nothing but poorly thrown together junk.

]]> By: areyouscreening http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/06/23/the-philanthropist-tv-review/comment-page-1#comment-1017 areyouscreening Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:28:34 +0000 http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=4007#comment-1017 Well, the story being far-fetched and unbelievable is slightly difficult to dance with unless you're more specific, because it's based on a true story. What's the unbelievable part?<br><br>I have no qualms at all with tearing apart anything, no matter what it's about, if that's what it deserves.<br><br>I didn't think it was great, but it has potential. If you think the acting in this was horrible, I'd love to know what you're watching.<br><br>On the other hand, while I don't agree with your reaction, and feel that it is probably based more on theory than actualization, I don't think there is a moral or ethical need for you to rescind your viewpoint... which is a nonsensical statement. Well, the story being far-fetched and unbelievable is slightly difficult to dance with unless you're more specific, because it's based on a true story. What's the unbelievable part?

I have no qualms at all with tearing apart anything, no matter what it's about, if that's what it deserves.

I didn't think it was great, but it has potential. If you think the acting in this was horrible, I'd love to know what you're watching.

On the other hand, while I don't agree with your reaction, and feel that it is probably based more on theory than actualization, I don't think there is a moral or ethical need for you to rescind your viewpoint… which is a nonsensical statement.

]]> By: ChickenSammie http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/06/23/the-philanthropist-tv-review/comment-page-1#comment-1018 ChickenSammie Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:02:51 +0000 http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=4007#comment-1018 Are you kidding me? The show looked great I'll give it that. The Cinematography was top-notch. But boy oh boy was the writing and acting 3rd rate. Lord was the story far-fetched and unbelievable. Everything was just ridiculousy cliche'. The problem for you reviewers is if you pan this terrible show (like it deserves) then you look heartless because the show is about philanthropy. If you don't pan it then you're not being true to good story-telling and acting. But you should rescind your review and tell it like is. This show was nothing but poorly written fluff that used all the cheap methods in the book to tug at the heartstrings of the ignorant. If anyone would like me to go into details I would be happy to fully suppor tmy claim that this show is nothing but poorly thrown together junk. Are you kidding me? The show looked great I'll give it that. The Cinematography was top-notch. But boy oh boy was the writing and acting 3rd rate. Lord was the story far-fetched and unbelievable. Everything was just ridiculousy cliche'. The problem for you reviewers is if you pan this terrible show (like it deserves) then you look heartless because the show is about philanthropy. If you don't pan it then you're not being true to good story-telling and acting. But you should rescind your review and tell it like is. This show was nothing but poorly written fluff that used all the cheap methods in the book to tug at the heartstrings of the ignorant. If anyone would like me to go into details I would be happy to fully suppor tmy claim that this show is nothing but poorly thrown together junk.

]]> By: areyouscreening http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/06/23/the-philanthropist-tv-review/comment-page-1#comment-1415 areyouscreening Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:28:34 +0000 http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=4007#comment-1415 Well, the story being far-fetched and unbelievable is slightly difficult to dance with unless you're more specific, because it's based on a true story. What's the unbelievable part?<br><br>I have no qualms at all with tearing apart anything, no matter what it's about, if that's what it deserves.<br><br>I didn't think it was great, but it has potential. If you think the acting in this was horrible, I'd love to know what you're watching.<br><br>On the other hand, while I don't agree with your reaction, and feel that it is probably based more on theory than actualization, I don't think there is a moral or ethical need for you to rescind your viewpoint... which is a nonsensical statement. Well, the story being far-fetched and unbelievable is slightly difficult to dance with unless you're more specific, because it's based on a true story. What's the unbelievable part?

I have no qualms at all with tearing apart anything, no matter what it's about, if that's what it deserves.

I didn't think it was great, but it has potential. If you think the acting in this was horrible, I'd love to know what you're watching.

On the other hand, while I don't agree with your reaction, and feel that it is probably based more on theory than actualization, I don't think there is a moral or ethical need for you to rescind your viewpoint… which is a nonsensical statement.

]]> By: ChickenSammie http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/06/23/the-philanthropist-tv-review/comment-page-1#comment-1414 ChickenSammie Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:02:51 +0000 http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=4007#comment-1414 Are you kidding me? The show looked great I'll give it that. The Cinematography was top-notch. But boy oh boy was the writing and acting 3rd rate. Lord was the story far-fetched and unbelievable. Everything was just ridiculousy cliche'. The problem for you reviewers is if you pan this terrible show (like it deserves) then you look heartless because the show is about philanthropy. If you don't pan it then you're not being true to good story-telling and acting. But you should rescind your review and tell it like is. This show was nothing but poorly written fluff that used all the cheap methods in the book to tug at the heartstrings of the ignorant. If anyone would like me to go into details I would be happy to fully suppor tmy claim that this show is nothing but poorly thrown together junk. Are you kidding me? The show looked great I'll give it that. The Cinematography was top-notch. But boy oh boy was the writing and acting 3rd rate. Lord was the story far-fetched and unbelievable. Everything was just ridiculousy cliche'. The problem for you reviewers is if you pan this terrible show (like it deserves) then you look heartless because the show is about philanthropy. If you don't pan it then you're not being true to good story-telling and acting. But you should rescind your review and tell it like is. This show was nothing but poorly written fluff that used all the cheap methods in the book to tug at the heartstrings of the ignorant. If anyone would like me to go into details I would be happy to fully suppor tmy claim that this show is nothing but poorly thrown together junk.

]]>