Ben Stiller‘s second foray into the world of museum artifacts springing to life is a fun, summer romp, but it suffers somewhat for the loss of the initial plot arc. There’s a lot going on, but it’s mostly in the ‘excuse to have another movie’ category, and not really much that serves a storyline.
Since we last saw him, Larry Daley has moved on from his life at the museum. He’s now an infomercial company guru, who sells products like the glow-in-the-dark flashlight (you know, so you can find it), and he’s apparently quite wealthy. He visits the old boys once in a while, who still come to life at night, but he just doesn’t make it much these days. As our story begins, he finds that the museum is closed for renovations, and those renovations include getting rid of most of the exhibits.
They’re being moved to storage in the National Archive below The Smithsonian, and though Larry tries to stop it, they’re boxed up and sent off just the same. Then Larry gets a call from Jedediah (Owen Wilson‘s wee cowboy character), and it seems as though that rascally monkey stole the Egyptian tablet responsible for bringing everything to life, and now the entire archives are going wild. Worse, we’ve run into Kahmunrah (Hank Azaria), and he wants the tablet so he can use it to take over the world.

Larry flies to D.C. as quick as he can, and as soon as he finds a way into the restricted archives, we’re off and running. We quickly run into Kahmunrah, who is fascinated by the fact that he’s come Baaaccckkk to Liifffeeee!!! Our initial chase teams Larry up with newcomers to the series General Custer (Bill Hader) and Amelia Earhart (Amy Adams). On the flip side, Kahmunrah soon enlists the aid of Ivan the Terrible (a brilliant Christopher Guest), Al Capone (Jon Bernthal), and Napoleon (Alain Chabat). Our plot is a frantic dash to open a doorway to the underworld, or to prevent same, and to wander as much of The Smithsonian as possible in order to throw around gimmicky tricks.
The movie pulls you along decently, with Amy Adams matching Stiller for pure likability, but the movie has too little story and too many things it wants to show you just for the sake of showing you. Make no mistake there though, both Stiller and Adams are fun to watch and do very good jobs. Unfortunately, many of the returning faces (Owen Wilson, Robin Williams, etc.) don’t get much screentime.
In order to pretend some point to the whole affair, Larry seems to have some issues with his new lifestyle, and Amelia Earhart may be just the firecracker to get him to realize he isn’t very happy.
Whatever flaws it may have from a very serious film critic perspective (and there are a lot), the movie is a family film gold mine. Not only is the movie really quite fun and filled with laughable moments, it throws out a lot of interesting information about history, and presents a unique vision of, “See, this is why museums are cool.” It’s been a while since I heard an audience laugh through so much of movie’s runtime, and my son (8) would walk to The Smithsonian right now if I let him.
You have to go into this with a very light frame of mind, but it’s a sequel, and you knew what you were getting into on that score. Weird pacing, and a misguided focus on gags vs. storyline, among other things, make it impossible to give this one a high rating, but if you’ve got the right age group in tow or just want to let go to sheer escapism, your money is well spent here.
Rating: 



Win!
Leave a comment on this review, and you are entered to win two fabulous prizes. First, a shirt from muzeclothing.com. Click on the picture to go to their website and find out more about this great shirt.
Winner for the shirt will be chosen on June 20th.
Second, you are also entered to win your choice of a standard or Blu-Ray copy of the DVD of Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian. Winner will be chosen on the day of the DVD release.
Good luck.
Are You Screening?
Related articles by Zemanta
- “Night at the Museum: Battle at the Smithsonian” Premieres in London (hunkyblog.com)
- What Now? Night At The Museum 2 Trailers (rockpapershotgun.com)
- Smithsonian Hosts Its First Hollywood Premiere (huffingtonpost.com)
- Ricky Gervais and Ben Stiller at premiere of Night At The Museum 2 (telegraph.co.uk)
- New Night At The Museum 2 Trailer: Darth Vader Allied With Oscar The Grouch! (cinemablend.com)
- Smithsonian gets ready for “Night at the Museum” mania (seattletimes.nwsource.com)




![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=825e7dc8-8e74-4203-9f9b-18ef9c4a1d6c)
Scott Pilgrim vs. The World Movie Review
Date Night Blu-Ray Review And Giveaway
Eat Pray Love Movie Review
The Other Guys Movie Review
Cop Out Blu-Ray Review And Giveaway
Inception Movie Review
Winnebago Man Review
I'm not a Ben Stiller fan and I found the first one, okay, but my husband and daughter loved it. So, when the new one came out, they went to see it, but the lack of story apparently affected them more than it affected you. Whereas my daughter just felt it was disappointing, my husband was disgusted.
Perhaps it would be best for those that wanted something light but weren't particularly familiar with the first. The comparison, I suspect, made a real impact with my family.
I didn't like how there was really no closure at the smithsonian, the entire place is trashed, the exhibits are everywhere, and he just leaves with the tablet, nothing is resolved except for the exhibits he likes are safe back in new york. Also when Earhart flies away at the end, wouldn't she change back after she got a certain distance from the tablet, and then crash her plane possibly killing people. Weak plot, weaker ending. Very disappointing after how good the first film was.
The first one was decent,I didnt think it needed a sequal,but anything with that Indian girl (I cant spell that name if my life depended on it) in it,cant be a bad flick!!!
The first one was decent,I didnt think it needed a sequal,but anything with that Indian girl (I cant spell that name if my life depended on it) in it,cant be a bad flick!!!
The movie was big, big, letdown and too boring.
This film thinks that because it's a children's movie it has a license to be lazy. When will filmmakers realized that kids' movies don't have to be plotless, incomprehensible dreck.
I really only want to see this movie for Amy Adams.
I really only want to see this movie for Amy Adams.
i really liked the first movie and have not seen this one but hope to see it soon the review that you wrote makes it look good
i really liked the first movie and have not seen this one but hope to see it soon the review that you wrote makes it look good
I would love to win this movie on blu-ray!
I would love to win this movie on blu-ray!