<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek &#8211; Movie Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:40:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc_Eastman</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc_Eastman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-896</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for coming back and letting me know.  Very glad you did.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for coming back and letting me know.  Very glad you did.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc_Eastman</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-17925</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc_Eastman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-17925</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for coming back and letting me know.  Very glad you did.  
  
Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for coming back and letting me know.  Very glad you did.  </p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenmed</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Zenmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-897</guid>
		<description>I did enjoy the movie a lot. Some of my friends who also saw the movies have no knowledge of Star Trek. They enjoyed the movie a lot and they have become more interested in getting to know Star Trek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did enjoy the movie a lot. Some of my friends who also saw the movies have no knowledge of Star Trek. They enjoyed the movie a lot and they have become more interested in getting to know Star Trek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenmed</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-17924</link>
		<dc:creator>Zenmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-17924</guid>
		<description>I did enjoy the movie a lot. Some of my friends who also saw the movies have no knowledge of Star Trek. They enjoyed the movie a lot and they have become more interested in getting to know Star Trek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did enjoy the movie a lot. Some of my friends who also saw the movies have no knowledge of Star Trek. They enjoyed the movie a lot and they have become more interested in getting to know Star Trek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanieebarr</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-8663</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanieebarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 04:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-8663</guid>
		<description>I did indeed like it very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did indeed like it very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanieebarr</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanieebarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-895</guid>
		<description>I did indeed like it very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did indeed like it very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanieebarr</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanieebarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>I did indeed like it very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did indeed like it very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 22:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-893</guid>
		<description>No digital format can come close to the projection/resolution of a good 16:9 35mm print and a 70mm projection on a 60 foot screen...  not even in the same galaxy (as it were)... digital is improving every year, and for 8x10 photos you can easily argue digital is as good as film...  (close)... but at these projection sizes there is no digital equivalent that can match film. The projector technology alone for digital film projection is still years from coming close to the tonal range and latitude of projected motion picture film. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It will get there one day, but it will be years still... perhaps a decade or more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No digital format can come close to the projection/resolution of a good 16:9 35mm print and a 70mm projection on a 60 foot screen&#8230;  not even in the same galaxy (as it were)&#8230; digital is improving every year, and for 8&#215;10 photos you can easily argue digital is as good as film&#8230;  (close)&#8230; but at these projection sizes there is no digital equivalent that can match film. The projector technology alone for digital film projection is still years from coming close to the tonal range and latitude of projected motion picture film. </p>
<p>It will get there one day, but it will be years still&#8230; perhaps a decade or more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>No digital format can come close to the projection/resolution of a good 16:9 35mm print and a 70mm projection on a 60 foot screen...  not even in the same galaxy (as it were)... digital is improving every year, and for 8x10 photos you can easily argue digital is as good as film...  (close)... but at these projection sizes there is no digital equivalent that can match film. The projector technology alone for digital film projection is still years from coming close to the tonal range and latitude of projected motion picture film. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It will get there one day, but it will be years still... perhaps a decade or more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No digital format can come close to the projection/resolution of a good 16:9 35mm print and a 70mm projection on a 60 foot screen&#8230;  not even in the same galaxy (as it were)&#8230; digital is improving every year, and for 8&#215;10 photos you can easily argue digital is as good as film&#8230;  (close)&#8230; but at these projection sizes there is no digital equivalent that can match film. The projector technology alone for digital film projection is still years from coming close to the tonal range and latitude of projected motion picture film. </p>
<p>It will get there one day, but it will be years still&#8230; perhaps a decade or more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: areyouscreening</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>areyouscreening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-886</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s SO what I said.  :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My guess is that you&#039;ll like it pretty well, as I did, but it&#039;s only a guess.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s SO what I said.  <img src='http://www.areyouscreening.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My guess is that you&#39;ll like it pretty well, as I did, but it&#39;s only a guess.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: areyouscreening</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>areyouscreening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-888</guid>
		<description>Exactly, and thanks for the comment.  If you give the original series grief about science, you might as well go to a stageplay and worry about the sets not really being trees or whatever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Nero got shortchanged, sort of, because he almost had to be.  The more you look at him, the less you have a villain.  Or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, and thanks for the comment.  If you give the original series grief about science, you might as well go to a stageplay and worry about the sets not really being trees or whatever.</p>
<p>I think Nero got shortchanged, sort of, because he almost had to be.  The more you look at him, the less you have a villain.  Or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: areyouscreening</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator>areyouscreening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-1263</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s SO what I said.  :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My guess is that you&#039;ll like it pretty well, as I did, but it&#039;s only a guess.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s SO what I said.  <img src='http://www.areyouscreening.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My guess is that you&#39;ll like it pretty well, as I did, but it&#39;s only a guess.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: areyouscreening</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>areyouscreening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>Exactly, and thanks for the comment.  If you give the original series grief about science, you might as well go to a stageplay and worry about the sets not really being trees or whatever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Nero got shortchanged, sort of, because he almost had to be.  The more you look at him, the less you have a villain.  Or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, and thanks for the comment.  If you give the original series grief about science, you might as well go to a stageplay and worry about the sets not really being trees or whatever.</p>
<p>I think Nero got shortchanged, sort of, because he almost had to be.  The more you look at him, the less you have a villain.  Or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanieebarr</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanieebarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-889</guid>
		<description>I meant to catch this on mother&#039;s day, but I was under the weather (seriously under).  I loved the old show, nonsense and all and always felt that the interaction of characters was the key, the perfect interplay of unlikely compatriots.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I never thought they quite caught that in the later incarnations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even imperfect, I&#039;m planning to go and enjoy.  As a scientist, I&#039;ve long ago learned to check my science hat at the door with damn near every science fiction movie (one, maybe two exceptions come to mind, three if you count Apollo 13 as science fiction).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll be tickled to death if they do a credible job of bringing my favorites together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to catch this on mother&#39;s day, but I was under the weather (seriously under).  I loved the old show, nonsense and all and always felt that the interaction of characters was the key, the perfect interplay of unlikely compatriots.</p>
<p>I never thought they quite caught that in the later incarnations.</p>
<p>Even imperfect, I&#39;m planning to go and enjoy.  As a scientist, I&#39;ve long ago learned to check my science hat at the door with damn near every science fiction movie (one, maybe two exceptions come to mind, three if you count Apollo 13 as science fiction).</p>
<p>I&#39;ll be tickled to death if they do a credible job of bringing my favorites together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanieebarr</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-891</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanieebarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-891</guid>
		<description>I meant to catch this on mother&#039;s day, but I was under the weather (seriously under).  I loved the old show, nonsense and all and always felt that the interaction of characters was the key, the perfect interplay of unlikely compatriots.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I never thought they quite caught that in the later incarnations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even imperfect, I&#039;m planning to go and enjoy.  As a scientist, I&#039;ve long ago learned to check my science hat at the door with damn near every science fiction movie (one, maybe two exceptions come to mind, three if you count Apollo 13 as science fiction).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll be tickled to death if they do a credible job of bringing my favorites together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to catch this on mother&#39;s day, but I was under the weather (seriously under).  I loved the old show, nonsense and all and always felt that the interaction of characters was the key, the perfect interplay of unlikely compatriots.</p>
<p>I never thought they quite caught that in the later incarnations.</p>
<p>Even imperfect, I&#39;m planning to go and enjoy.  As a scientist, I&#39;ve long ago learned to check my science hat at the door with damn near every science fiction movie (one, maybe two exceptions come to mind, three if you count Apollo 13 as science fiction).</p>
<p>I&#39;ll be tickled to death if they do a credible job of bringing my favorites together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanieebarr</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanieebarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-1262</guid>
		<description>I meant to catch this on mother&#039;s day, but I was under the weather (seriously under).  I loved the old show, nonsense and all and always felt that the interaction of characters was the key, the perfect interplay of unlikely compatriots.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I never thought they quite caught that in the later incarnations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even imperfect, I&#039;m planning to go and enjoy.  As a scientist, I&#039;ve long ago learned to check my science hat at the door with damn near every science fiction movie (one, maybe two exceptions come to mind, three if you count Apollo 13 as science fiction).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll be tickled to death if they do a credible job of bringing my favorites together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to catch this on mother&#39;s day, but I was under the weather (seriously under).  I loved the old show, nonsense and all and always felt that the interaction of characters was the key, the perfect interplay of unlikely compatriots.</p>
<p>I never thought they quite caught that in the later incarnations.</p>
<p>Even imperfect, I&#39;m planning to go and enjoy.  As a scientist, I&#39;ve long ago learned to check my science hat at the door with damn near every science fiction movie (one, maybe two exceptions come to mind, three if you count Apollo 13 as science fiction).</p>
<p>I&#39;ll be tickled to death if they do a credible job of bringing my favorites together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Val</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-894</guid>
		<description>Great review. I love your description of Kirk as Bond/Joey, that is so spot on...heh. I really feel that what held us all to the original series with its styrofoam rocks and spaceships on strings was the relationships between the characters. We grew to love the spiky doctor and rash captain and his logical science officer with the cool pointy ears. That&#039;s what I so loved about the new Star Trek--they recaptured that sense of joy of camaraderie, and we all felt like we&#039;d been reunited with old friends we&#039;ve loved and missed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also like your assessment of Abrams&#039; failing with character study--making all the right noises w/o really understanding the process. I think that&#039;s something that Wolverine really suffered from--by comparison Star Trek looks so much better. I did feel Nero got shorted in this, though--he inspired enough interest and I think the picture would have resonated more if we&#039;d delved into his timeline a bit more. I realize he was just a plot point in this introductory film, but he was too complex and intriguing to be reduced to cardboard villian. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Over all a ridiculously enjoyable film, and if I can forgive the styrofoam rocks and the red shirt=death scenarios, I can forgive this film a few modern day flaws as well. *G*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review. I love your description of Kirk as Bond/Joey, that is so spot on&#8230;heh. I really feel that what held us all to the original series with its styrofoam rocks and spaceships on strings was the relationships between the characters. We grew to love the spiky doctor and rash captain and his logical science officer with the cool pointy ears. That&#39;s what I so loved about the new Star Trek&#8211;they recaptured that sense of joy of camaraderie, and we all felt like we&#39;d been reunited with old friends we&#39;ve loved and missed.</p>
<p>I also like your assessment of Abrams&#39; failing with character study&#8211;making all the right noises w/o really understanding the process. I think that&#39;s something that Wolverine really suffered from&#8211;by comparison Star Trek looks so much better. I did feel Nero got shorted in this, though&#8211;he inspired enough interest and I think the picture would have resonated more if we&#39;d delved into his timeline a bit more. I realize he was just a plot point in this introductory film, but he was too complex and intriguing to be reduced to cardboard villian. </p>
<p>Over all a ridiculously enjoyable film, and if I can forgive the styrofoam rocks and the red shirt=death scenarios, I can forgive this film a few modern day flaws as well. *G*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Val</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 02:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-1260</guid>
		<description>Great review. I love your description of Kirk as Bond/Joey, that is so spot on...heh. I really feel that what held us all to the original series with its styrofoam rocks and spaceships on strings was the relationships between the characters. We grew to love the spiky doctor and rash captain and his logical science officer with the cool pointy ears. That&#039;s what I so loved about the new Star Trek--they recaptured that sense of joy of camaraderie, and we all felt like we&#039;d been reunited with old friends we&#039;ve loved and missed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also like your assessment of Abrams&#039; failing with character study--making all the right noises w/o really understanding the process. I think that&#039;s something that Wolverine really suffered from--by comparison Star Trek looks so much better. I did feel Nero got shorted in this, though--he inspired enough interest and I think the picture would have resonated more if we&#039;d delved into his timeline a bit more. I realize he was just a plot point in this introductory film, but he was too complex and intriguing to be reduced to cardboard villian. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Over all a ridiculously enjoyable film, and if I can forgive the styrofoam rocks and the red shirt=death scenarios, I can forgive this film a few modern day flaws as well. *G*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review. I love your description of Kirk as Bond/Joey, that is so spot on&#8230;heh. I really feel that what held us all to the original series with its styrofoam rocks and spaceships on strings was the relationships between the characters. We grew to love the spiky doctor and rash captain and his logical science officer with the cool pointy ears. That&#39;s what I so loved about the new Star Trek&#8211;they recaptured that sense of joy of camaraderie, and we all felt like we&#39;d been reunited with old friends we&#39;ve loved and missed.</p>
<p>I also like your assessment of Abrams&#39; failing with character study&#8211;making all the right noises w/o really understanding the process. I think that&#39;s something that Wolverine really suffered from&#8211;by comparison Star Trek looks so much better. I did feel Nero got shorted in this, though&#8211;he inspired enough interest and I think the picture would have resonated more if we&#39;d delved into his timeline a bit more. I realize he was just a plot point in this introductory film, but he was too complex and intriguing to be reduced to cardboard villian. </p>
<p>Over all a ridiculously enjoyable film, and if I can forgive the styrofoam rocks and the red shirt=death scenarios, I can forgive this film a few modern day flaws as well. *G*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: areyouscreening</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>areyouscreening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-887</guid>
		<description>Wow.  Too much to cover there my friend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are a great many points that could be picked apart, mostly especially I&#039;ll give you the ludicrous design of the Romulan ship, but you could do as much with the original series and/or just about anything sci-fi.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Warp speed will work if you&#039;ve got nothing else.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The game assumes a sort of contract to suspend some amount of disbelief.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&#039;ve got to play along to some degree, or at some point you&#039;re misgivings become uninteresting.  You may not like time travel, and fair enough frankly, but, &quot;there&#039;s time travel in it, and there&#039;s no such thing as time travel,&quot; is hardly a workable detraction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You have to draw the line somewhere with respect to the scrutiny you can legitimately aim at a movie.  After all, it&#039;s got time in it too, and there&#039;s no such thing as that either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Appreciate the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Too much to cover there my friend.</p>
<p>There are a great many points that could be picked apart, mostly especially I&#39;ll give you the ludicrous design of the Romulan ship, but you could do as much with the original series and/or just about anything sci-fi.</p>
<p>Warp speed will work if you&#39;ve got nothing else.</p>
<p>The game assumes a sort of contract to suspend some amount of disbelief.</p>
<p>You&#39;ve got to play along to some degree, or at some point you&#39;re misgivings become uninteresting.  You may not like time travel, and fair enough frankly, but, &#8220;there&#39;s time travel in it, and there&#39;s no such thing as time travel,&#8221; is hardly a workable detraction.</p>
<p>You have to draw the line somewhere with respect to the scrutiny you can legitimately aim at a movie.  After all, it&#39;s got time in it too, and there&#39;s no such thing as that either.</p>
<p>Appreciate the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flinx</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>Flinx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-890</guid>
		<description>When will hollywood learn that the quickest way to make a crappy movie is to use &quot;Time Travel&quot; as a plot device, and so it is that we come to the polished turd that is &quot;Star Trek: The Motion Picture&quot; (no not that one, the new one).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While were on the subject lets throw the canon in a corner and take a massive crap on it. Then take the pieces that didn&#039;t get any shit on them and throw them back in to the movie willy nilly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I almost didn&#039;t go to see this movie when I heard it involved time travel. I mean the instant you bring TT into a movie it is nearly impossible to reconcile the paradoxes thus created. Seriously.... Deranged miner blames Spock for the destruction of Romulus so he &quot;ends up&quot; going back in time and once there decides to exact revenge on Spock by destroying Vulcan and Earth. Oh yeah Spock also &quot;ends up&quot; going back in time 25 years after that, and mean ol&#039; Romulan guy is waiting for him, captures him and then proceeds to destroy Vulcan (and kills Spock&#039;s mom too the big meanie), and now we have 2 Spock&#039;s in one time and some junk that makes &quot;Black holes&quot; called &quot;Red Matter&quot; (imaginative name ay! cause it&#039;s matter, and it&#039;s red... get it?), and all the history of who, how, and what is thrown out the windows (the canon). So if Romulus is destroyed what would be the point of attempting to make peace with a race who&#039;s planet will be destroyed in a supernova some time in the future? You figure out the logic (or lack thereof) behind it all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Next up lets change some of the characters.... Like making Spock and Uhura hot for each other (what, Ohhhh!, Huh?). Wasn&#039;t it Nurse Chapel who was hot for Spock, Oh... Right she&#039;s not in this one. Oh and Uhura rooms with a green Orion slave girl with a bad body paint job (cause Starfleet needs horny oversexed controlling women in it&#039;s ranks). Well make Scotty an eccentric guy with a little alien comic relief dude for an assistant. Then there&#039;s the reckless, yet some how always right Kirk. Except Kirk was never reckless. Spock is played as a brooding know it all (broderline EMO) douche bag who flies off the handle over the slightest insult, and don&#039;t even say &quot;yo mama&quot; to him. Then for good measure toss in a little bit of Sulu and Chekov (just a little cause we don&#039;t know how to develop their characters). Though we will make Chekov an over reactive spaz. Then there are the Vulcan&#039;s who have suddenly become snotty eugenics types who conveniently have emotions whenever they feel like it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now the ships and equipment... The inside of the ships vary from hospital like sterility with a touch of art deco discotheque thrown in, to what looks like a large chemical plant , sewer plant, or maybe a brewery. The hand phasers did a silly mechanical switching from stun to kill. The giant mining ship looked like it escaped from an episode of Babylon 5. For a utilitarian device it has alot of un-necessary nasty/evil looking spikes and protrusions all over it. I could just see some Romulan ship designer having his design rejected for not being SCARY enough &quot;damn the cost! I want my mining ship to scare the piss out of an asteroid before I strip it of minerals&quot;. The Enterprise looked like Chihuly had a hand in it&#039;s design.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Okay... Enough Bashing, now to the things I did like about the movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The CG and special effects are top notch. The battle scenes are nice and messy, and sometimes when we are outside the ship there is no sound (just like in real space). We get to see the Enterprise maneuver more like a fighter jet then wallow around going only left and right like they did in most of the TV series.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There were some quite funny, but mostly irrelevant moments throughout the movie. There is even the gratuitous red shirt who gets killed. Doctor McCoys Character is nearly spot on, and he spouts a few of TOS cliches. We actually get to see Captain Christopher Pike do something more that go &quot;beep&quot; or even &quot;beep.... Beep....&quot;. The original communicator even makes a couple of cameos.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the most part though they might as well have made the movie about a completely different set of characters that had nothing to do with the original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will hollywood learn that the quickest way to make a crappy movie is to use &#8220;Time Travel&#8221; as a plot device, and so it is that we come to the polished turd that is &#8220;Star Trek: The Motion Picture&#8221; (no not that one, the new one).</p>
<p>While were on the subject lets throw the canon in a corner and take a massive crap on it. Then take the pieces that didn&#39;t get any shit on them and throw them back in to the movie willy nilly.</p>
<p>I almost didn&#39;t go to see this movie when I heard it involved time travel. I mean the instant you bring TT into a movie it is nearly impossible to reconcile the paradoxes thus created. Seriously&#8230;. Deranged miner blames Spock for the destruction of Romulus so he &#8220;ends up&#8221; going back in time and once there decides to exact revenge on Spock by destroying Vulcan and Earth. Oh yeah Spock also &#8220;ends up&#8221; going back in time 25 years after that, and mean ol&#39; Romulan guy is waiting for him, captures him and then proceeds to destroy Vulcan (and kills Spock&#39;s mom too the big meanie), and now we have 2 Spock&#39;s in one time and some junk that makes &#8220;Black holes&#8221; called &#8220;Red Matter&#8221; (imaginative name ay! cause it&#39;s matter, and it&#39;s red&#8230; get it?), and all the history of who, how, and what is thrown out the windows (the canon). So if Romulus is destroyed what would be the point of attempting to make peace with a race who&#39;s planet will be destroyed in a supernova some time in the future? You figure out the logic (or lack thereof) behind it all.</p>
<p>Next up lets change some of the characters&#8230;. Like making Spock and Uhura hot for each other (what, Ohhhh!, Huh?). Wasn&#39;t it Nurse Chapel who was hot for Spock, Oh&#8230; Right she&#39;s not in this one. Oh and Uhura rooms with a green Orion slave girl with a bad body paint job (cause Starfleet needs horny oversexed controlling women in it&#39;s ranks). Well make Scotty an eccentric guy with a little alien comic relief dude for an assistant. Then there&#39;s the reckless, yet some how always right Kirk. Except Kirk was never reckless. Spock is played as a brooding know it all (broderline EMO) douche bag who flies off the handle over the slightest insult, and don&#39;t even say &#8220;yo mama&#8221; to him. Then for good measure toss in a little bit of Sulu and Chekov (just a little cause we don&#39;t know how to develop their characters). Though we will make Chekov an over reactive spaz. Then there are the Vulcan&#39;s who have suddenly become snotty eugenics types who conveniently have emotions whenever they feel like it.</p>
<p>Now the ships and equipment&#8230; The inside of the ships vary from hospital like sterility with a touch of art deco discotheque thrown in, to what looks like a large chemical plant , sewer plant, or maybe a brewery. The hand phasers did a silly mechanical switching from stun to kill. The giant mining ship looked like it escaped from an episode of Babylon 5. For a utilitarian device it has alot of un-necessary nasty/evil looking spikes and protrusions all over it. I could just see some Romulan ship designer having his design rejected for not being SCARY enough &#8220;damn the cost! I want my mining ship to scare the piss out of an asteroid before I strip it of minerals&#8221;. The Enterprise looked like Chihuly had a hand in it&#39;s design.</p>
<p>Okay&#8230; Enough Bashing, now to the things I did like about the movie.</p>
<p>The CG and special effects are top notch. The battle scenes are nice and messy, and sometimes when we are outside the ship there is no sound (just like in real space). We get to see the Enterprise maneuver more like a fighter jet then wallow around going only left and right like they did in most of the TV series.</p>
<p>There were some quite funny, but mostly irrelevant moments throughout the movie. There is even the gratuitous red shirt who gets killed. Doctor McCoys Character is nearly spot on, and he spouts a few of TOS cliches. We actually get to see Captain Christopher Pike do something more that go &#8220;beep&#8221; or even &#8220;beep&#8230;. Beep&#8230;.&#8221;. The original communicator even makes a couple of cameos.</p>
<p>For the most part though they might as well have made the movie about a completely different set of characters that had nothing to do with the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: areyouscreening</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator>areyouscreening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-1259</guid>
		<description>Wow.  Too much to cover there my friend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are a great many points that could be picked apart, mostly especially I&#039;ll give you the ludicrous design of the Romulan ship, but you could do as much with the original series and/or just about anything sci-fi.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Warp speed will work if you&#039;ve got nothing else.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The game assumes a sort of contract to suspend some amount of disbelief.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&#039;ve got to play along to some degree, or at some point you&#039;re misgivings become uninteresting.  You may not like time travel, and fair enough frankly, but, &quot;there&#039;s time travel in it, and there&#039;s no such thing as time travel,&quot; is hardly a workable detraction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You have to draw the line somewhere with respect to the scrutiny you can legitimately aim at a movie.  After all, it&#039;s got time in it too, and there&#039;s no such thing as that either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Appreciate the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Too much to cover there my friend.</p>
<p>There are a great many points that could be picked apart, mostly especially I&#39;ll give you the ludicrous design of the Romulan ship, but you could do as much with the original series and/or just about anything sci-fi.</p>
<p>Warp speed will work if you&#39;ve got nothing else.</p>
<p>The game assumes a sort of contract to suspend some amount of disbelief.</p>
<p>You&#39;ve got to play along to some degree, or at some point you&#39;re misgivings become uninteresting.  You may not like time travel, and fair enough frankly, but, &#8220;there&#39;s time travel in it, and there&#39;s no such thing as time travel,&#8221; is hardly a workable detraction.</p>
<p>You have to draw the line somewhere with respect to the scrutiny you can legitimately aim at a movie.  After all, it&#39;s got time in it too, and there&#39;s no such thing as that either.</p>
<p>Appreciate the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flinx</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>Flinx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 22:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>When will hollywood learn that the quickest way to make a crappy movie is to use &quot;Time Travel&quot; as a plot device, and so it is that we come to the polished turd that is &quot;Star Trek: The Motion Picture&quot; (no not that one, the new one).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While were on the subject lets throw the canon in a corner and take a massive crap on it. Then take the pieces that didn&#039;t get any shit on them and throw them back in to the movie willy nilly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I almost didn&#039;t go to see this movie when I heard it involved time travel. I mean the instant you bring TT into a movie it is nearly impossible to reconcile the paradoxes thus created. Seriously.... Deranged miner blames Spock for the destruction of Romulus so he &quot;ends up&quot; going back in time and once there decides to exact revenge on Spock by destroying Vulcan and Earth. Oh yeah Spock also &quot;ends up&quot; going back in time 25 years after that, and mean ol&#039; Romulan guy is waiting for him, captures him and then proceeds to destroy Vulcan (and kills Spock&#039;s mom too the big meanie), and now we have 2 Spock&#039;s in one time and some junk that makes &quot;Black holes&quot; called &quot;Red Matter&quot; (imaginative name ay! cause it&#039;s matter, and it&#039;s red... get it?), and all the history of who, how, and what is thrown out the windows (the canon). So if Romulus is destroyed what would be the point of attempting to make peace with a race who&#039;s planet will be destroyed in a supernova some time in the future? You figure out the logic (or lack thereof) behind it all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Next up lets change some of the characters.... Like making Spock and Uhura hot for each other (what, Ohhhh!, Huh?). Wasn&#039;t it Nurse Chapel who was hot for Spock, Oh... Right she&#039;s not in this one. Oh and Uhura rooms with a green Orion slave girl with a bad body paint job (cause Starfleet needs horny oversexed controlling women in it&#039;s ranks). Well make Scotty an eccentric guy with a little alien comic relief dude for an assistant. Then there&#039;s the reckless, yet some how always right Kirk. Except Kirk was never reckless. Spock is played as a brooding know it all (broderline EMO) douche bag who flies off the handle over the slightest insult, and don&#039;t even say &quot;yo mama&quot; to him. Then for good measure toss in a little bit of Sulu and Chekov (just a little cause we don&#039;t know how to develop their characters). Though we will make Chekov an over reactive spaz. Then there are the Vulcan&#039;s who have suddenly become snotty eugenics types who conveniently have emotions whenever they feel like it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now the ships and equipment... The inside of the ships vary from hospital like sterility with a touch of art deco discotheque thrown in, to what looks like a large chemical plant , sewer plant, or maybe a brewery. The hand phasers did a silly mechanical switching from stun to kill. The giant mining ship looked like it escaped from an episode of Babylon 5. For a utilitarian device it has alot of un-necessary nasty/evil looking spikes and protrusions all over it. I could just see some Romulan ship designer having his design rejected for not being SCARY enough &quot;damn the cost! I want my mining ship to scare the piss out of an asteroid before I strip it of minerals&quot;. The Enterprise looked like Chihuly had a hand in it&#039;s design.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Okay... Enough Bashing, now to the things I did like about the movie.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The CG and special effects are top notch. The battle scenes are nice and messy, and sometimes when we are outside the ship there is no sound (just like in real space). We get to see the Enterprise maneuver more like a fighter jet then wallow around going only left and right like they did in most of the TV series.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There were some quite funny, but mostly irrelevant moments throughout the movie. There is even the gratuitous red shirt who gets killed. Doctor McCoys Character is nearly spot on, and he spouts a few of TOS cliches. We actually get to see Captain Christopher Pike do something more that go &quot;beep&quot; or even &quot;beep.... Beep....&quot;. The original communicator even makes a couple of cameos.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the most part though they might as well have made the movie about a completely different set of characters that had nothing to do with the original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will hollywood learn that the quickest way to make a crappy movie is to use &#8220;Time Travel&#8221; as a plot device, and so it is that we come to the polished turd that is &#8220;Star Trek: The Motion Picture&#8221; (no not that one, the new one).</p>
<p>While were on the subject lets throw the canon in a corner and take a massive crap on it. Then take the pieces that didn&#39;t get any shit on them and throw them back in to the movie willy nilly.</p>
<p>I almost didn&#39;t go to see this movie when I heard it involved time travel. I mean the instant you bring TT into a movie it is nearly impossible to reconcile the paradoxes thus created. Seriously&#8230;. Deranged miner blames Spock for the destruction of Romulus so he &#8220;ends up&#8221; going back in time and once there decides to exact revenge on Spock by destroying Vulcan and Earth. Oh yeah Spock also &#8220;ends up&#8221; going back in time 25 years after that, and mean ol&#39; Romulan guy is waiting for him, captures him and then proceeds to destroy Vulcan (and kills Spock&#39;s mom too the big meanie), and now we have 2 Spock&#39;s in one time and some junk that makes &#8220;Black holes&#8221; called &#8220;Red Matter&#8221; (imaginative name ay! cause it&#39;s matter, and it&#39;s red&#8230; get it?), and all the history of who, how, and what is thrown out the windows (the canon). So if Romulus is destroyed what would be the point of attempting to make peace with a race who&#39;s planet will be destroyed in a supernova some time in the future? You figure out the logic (or lack thereof) behind it all.</p>
<p>Next up lets change some of the characters&#8230;. Like making Spock and Uhura hot for each other (what, Ohhhh!, Huh?). Wasn&#39;t it Nurse Chapel who was hot for Spock, Oh&#8230; Right she&#39;s not in this one. Oh and Uhura rooms with a green Orion slave girl with a bad body paint job (cause Starfleet needs horny oversexed controlling women in it&#39;s ranks). Well make Scotty an eccentric guy with a little alien comic relief dude for an assistant. Then there&#39;s the reckless, yet some how always right Kirk. Except Kirk was never reckless. Spock is played as a brooding know it all (broderline EMO) douche bag who flies off the handle over the slightest insult, and don&#39;t even say &#8220;yo mama&#8221; to him. Then for good measure toss in a little bit of Sulu and Chekov (just a little cause we don&#39;t know how to develop their characters). Though we will make Chekov an over reactive spaz. Then there are the Vulcan&#39;s who have suddenly become snotty eugenics types who conveniently have emotions whenever they feel like it.</p>
<p>Now the ships and equipment&#8230; The inside of the ships vary from hospital like sterility with a touch of art deco discotheque thrown in, to what looks like a large chemical plant , sewer plant, or maybe a brewery. The hand phasers did a silly mechanical switching from stun to kill. The giant mining ship looked like it escaped from an episode of Babylon 5. For a utilitarian device it has alot of un-necessary nasty/evil looking spikes and protrusions all over it. I could just see some Romulan ship designer having his design rejected for not being SCARY enough &#8220;damn the cost! I want my mining ship to scare the piss out of an asteroid before I strip it of minerals&#8221;. The Enterprise looked like Chihuly had a hand in it&#39;s design.</p>
<p>Okay&#8230; Enough Bashing, now to the things I did like about the movie.</p>
<p>The CG and special effects are top notch. The battle scenes are nice and messy, and sometimes when we are outside the ship there is no sound (just like in real space). We get to see the Enterprise maneuver more like a fighter jet then wallow around going only left and right like they did in most of the TV series.</p>
<p>There were some quite funny, but mostly irrelevant moments throughout the movie. There is even the gratuitous red shirt who gets killed. Doctor McCoys Character is nearly spot on, and he spouts a few of TOS cliches. We actually get to see Captain Christopher Pike do something more that go &#8220;beep&#8221; or even &#8220;beep&#8230;. Beep&#8230;.&#8221;. The original communicator even makes a couple of cameos.</p>
<p>For the most part though they might as well have made the movie about a completely different set of characters that had nothing to do with the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomad</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-892</link>
		<dc:creator>Nomad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 21:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-892</guid>
		<description>Everything about this new Star Trek was great as far as i&#039;m concerned, except at the theater the reel kept jumping and the sound went out a couple of times... why are movie theaters still using film i wonder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything about this new Star Trek was great as far as i&#39;m concerned, except at the theater the reel kept jumping and the sound went out a couple of times&#8230; why are movie theaters still using film i wonder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomad</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator>Nomad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 20:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>Everything about this new Star Trek was great as far as i&#039;m concerned, except at the theater the reel kept jumping and the sound went out a couple of times... why are movie theaters still using film i wonder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything about this new Star Trek was great as far as i&#39;m concerned, except at the theater the reel kept jumping and the sound went out a couple of times&#8230; why are movie theaters still using film i wonder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

