<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek &#8211; Movie Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:36:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc_Eastman</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc_Eastman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-896</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for coming back and letting me know.  Very glad you did.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for coming back and letting me know.  Very glad you did.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenmed</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Zenmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-897</guid>
		<description>I did enjoy the movie a lot. Some of my friends who also saw the movies have no knowledge of Star Trek. They enjoyed the movie a lot and they have become more interested in getting to know Star Trek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did enjoy the movie a lot. Some of my friends who also saw the movies have no knowledge of Star Trek. They enjoyed the movie a lot and they have become more interested in getting to know Star Trek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanieebarr</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-8663</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanieebarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 04:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-8663</guid>
		<description>I did indeed like it very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did indeed like it very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanieebarr</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanieebarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-895</guid>
		<description>I did indeed like it very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did indeed like it very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanieebarr</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanieebarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>I did indeed like it very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did indeed like it very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 22:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-893</guid>
		<description>No digital format can come close to the projection/resolution of a good 16:9 35mm print and a 70mm projection on a 60 foot screen...  not even in the same galaxy (as it were)... digital is improving every year, and for 8x10 photos you can easily argue digital is as good as film...  (close)... but at these projection sizes there is no digital equivalent that can match film. The projector technology alone for digital film projection is still years from coming close to the tonal range and latitude of projected motion picture film. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It will get there one day, but it will be years still... perhaps a decade or more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No digital format can come close to the projection/resolution of a good 16:9 35mm print and a 70mm projection on a 60 foot screen&#8230;  not even in the same galaxy (as it were)&#8230; digital is improving every year, and for 8&#215;10 photos you can easily argue digital is as good as film&#8230;  (close)&#8230; but at these projection sizes there is no digital equivalent that can match film. The projector technology alone for digital film projection is still years from coming close to the tonal range and latitude of projected motion picture film. </p>
<p>It will get there one day, but it will be years still&#8230; perhaps a decade or more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>No digital format can come close to the projection/resolution of a good 16:9 35mm print and a 70mm projection on a 60 foot screen...  not even in the same galaxy (as it were)... digital is improving every year, and for 8x10 photos you can easily argue digital is as good as film...  (close)... but at these projection sizes there is no digital equivalent that can match film. The projector technology alone for digital film projection is still years from coming close to the tonal range and latitude of projected motion picture film. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It will get there one day, but it will be years still... perhaps a decade or more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No digital format can come close to the projection/resolution of a good 16:9 35mm print and a 70mm projection on a 60 foot screen&#8230;  not even in the same galaxy (as it were)&#8230; digital is improving every year, and for 8&#215;10 photos you can easily argue digital is as good as film&#8230;  (close)&#8230; but at these projection sizes there is no digital equivalent that can match film. The projector technology alone for digital film projection is still years from coming close to the tonal range and latitude of projected motion picture film. </p>
<p>It will get there one day, but it will be years still&#8230; perhaps a decade or more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: areyouscreening</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>areyouscreening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-886</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s SO what I said.  :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My guess is that you&#039;ll like it pretty well, as I did, but it&#039;s only a guess.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s SO what I said.  <img src='http://www.areyouscreening.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My guess is that you&#39;ll like it pretty well, as I did, but it&#39;s only a guess.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: areyouscreening</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>areyouscreening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-888</guid>
		<description>Exactly, and thanks for the comment.  If you give the original series grief about science, you might as well go to a stageplay and worry about the sets not really being trees or whatever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Nero got shortchanged, sort of, because he almost had to be.  The more you look at him, the less you have a villain.  Or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, and thanks for the comment.  If you give the original series grief about science, you might as well go to a stageplay and worry about the sets not really being trees or whatever.</p>
<p>I think Nero got shortchanged, sort of, because he almost had to be.  The more you look at him, the less you have a villain.  Or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: areyouscreening</title>
		<link>http://www.areyouscreening.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-movie-review/comment-page-1#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator>areyouscreening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.areyouscreening.com/?p=3085#comment-1263</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s SO what I said.  :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My guess is that you&#039;ll like it pretty well, as I did, but it&#039;s only a guess.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s SO what I said.  <img src='http://www.areyouscreening.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My guess is that you&#39;ll like it pretty well, as I did, but it&#39;s only a guess.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
